Featured
Table of Contents
Both propose to remove the ability to "online forum shop" by excluding a debtor's location of incorporation from the location analysis, andalarming to worldwide debtorsexcluding money or money equivalents from the "primary assets" formula. Furthermore, any equity interest in an affiliate will be deemed located in the same area as the principal.
Usually, this statement has been focused on controversial 3rd party release arrangements executed in recent mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Young Boy Scouts of America, and lots of Catholic diocese insolvencies. These provisions often require creditors to launch non-debtor third parties as part of the debtor's plan of reorganization, although such releases are arguably not permitted, at least in some circuits, by the Bankruptcy Code.
In effort to stamp out this habits, the proposed legislation claims to limit "forum shopping" by prohibiting entities from filing in any place except where their home office or primary physical assetsexcluding cash and equity interestsare situated. Seemingly, these expenses would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other US districts, and guide cases far from the favored courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
Despite their laudable function, these proposed changes might have unforeseen and potentially negative effects when seen from an international restructuring prospective. While congressional testimony and other analysts assume that location reform would simply guarantee that domestic companies would submit in a different jurisdiction within the United States, it is an unique possibility that global debtors may hand down the United States Insolvency Courts entirely.
Without the consideration of money accounts as an opportunity toward eligibility, numerous foreign corporations without tangible properties in the US may not qualify to file a Chapter 11 personal bankruptcy in any US jurisdiction. Second, even if they do certify, global debtors may not have the ability to rely on access to the normal and hassle-free reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Offered the intricate concerns regularly at play in a global restructuring case, this might trigger the debtor and financial institutions some uncertainty. This unpredictability, in turn, may inspire global debtors to file in their own nations, or in other more advantageous nations, instead. Significantly, this proposed place reform comes at a time when numerous countries are imitating the US and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which emphasized liquidation, the new Code's objective is to restructure and protect the entity as a going issue. Hence, debt restructuring contracts might be approved with as little as 30 percent approval from the general debt. Nevertheless, unlike the United States, Italy's brand-new Code will not include an automated stay of enforcement actions by creditors.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the country's approval of 3rd party release provisions. In Canada, companies generally rearrange under the conventional insolvency statutes of the Companies' Creditors Plan Act (). 3rd party releases under the CCAAwhile fiercely objected to in the USare a common element of restructuring strategies.
The current court decision makes clear, though, that despite the CBCA's more minimal nature, 3rd party release arrangements may still be appropriate. For that reason, business may still get themselves of a less troublesome restructuring available under the CBCA, while still getting the advantages of 3rd party releases. Efficient since January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has developed a debtor-in-possession treatment carried out beyond official personal bankruptcy procedures.
Efficient since January 1, 2021, Germany's brand-new Act upon the Stabilization and Restructuring Framework for Organizations attends to pre-insolvency restructuring procedures. Prior to its enactment, German companies had no option to reorganize their debts through the courts. Now, distressed companies can call upon German courts to reorganize their debts and otherwise preserve the going issue value of their organization by using a number of the exact same tools available in the United States, such as maintaining control of their company, imposing pack down restructuring strategies, and implementing collection moratoriums.
Inspired by Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, this brand-new structure streamlines the debtor-in-possession restructuring process mainly in effort to assist small and medium sized businesses. While previous law was long slammed as too pricey and too intricate since of its "one size fits all" approach, this new legislation includes the debtor in ownership design, and offers a structured liquidation process when essential In June 2020, the United Kingdom enacted the Business Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Significantly, CIGA attends to a collection moratorium, invalidates specific provisions of pre-insolvency contracts, and permits entities to propose a plan with shareholders and creditors, all of which permits the development of a cram-down plan similar to what might be accomplished under Chapter 11 of the US Personal Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore adopted enacted the Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made major legislative modifications to the restructuring arrangements of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As an outcome, the law has actually substantially enhanced the restructuring tools offered in Singapore courts and moved Singapore as a leading center for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In May of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Personal Bankruptcy Code, which completely revamped the bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation looks for to incentivize more financial investment in the country by offering greater certainty and efficiency to the restructuring process.
Given these current changes, international debtors now have more choices than ever. Even without the proposed restrictions on eligibility, foreign entities might less require to flock to the United States as in the past. Even more, must the US' place laws be amended to avoid easy filings in particular practical and beneficial venues, international debtors might begin to think about other areas.
Special thanks to Dallas associate Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this material under the supervision of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles office.
Commercial filings leapt 49% year-over-year the highest January level considering that 2018. The numbers reflect what debt professionals call "slow-burn financial pressure" that's been developing for years.
Avoiding Foreclosure Through HUD ProgramsCustomer insolvency filings amounted to 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Business filings hit 1,378 a 49% year-over-year dive and the highest January business filing level because 2018. For all of 2025, customer filings grew nearly 14%. (Source: Law360 Personal Bankruptcy Authority)44,282 Customer Filings in Jan 2026 +9%Year-Over-Year Increase +49%Business Filings YoY +14%Customer Filings All of 2025 January 2026 bankruptcy filings: 44,282 consumer, 1,378 business the highest January industrial level because 2018 Professionals quoted by Law360 describe the trend as showing "slow-burn monetary pressure." That's a refined way of saying what I've been seeing for years: people don't snap economically over night.
Latest Posts
Creating a Strategic Recovery Plan for 2026
Preventing Foreclosure Through Housing Counseling
Navigating the 2026 Insolvency Process

